The panel of peers ruled that a range of Moto smartphones in 2011 infringed US patent 7,810,144, which describes a process in which files are uploaded, authenticated by a third party to check the identity of the sender, and then passed on to other devices, but did not infringe US patent 7,409,540, which describes a TCP/IP packet-centric wireless point-to-multi-point transmission system architecture. Intellectual Ventures, known in the industry for its patent-hoarding methods, accused Motorola Mobility of using the technology in a dozen handset models without permission as part of its ongoing war against Lenovo-owned Moto.
It was the second time the two companies faced off in court after the first round ended in February 2014 due to mistrial after jurors could not agree on a verdict. Intellectual Ventures recently scored a $17 million win against Symantec and while it licenses its portfolio out to companies such as HTC and Samsung, it has recently become more well known for suing tech companies who might be infringing on its intellectual property. Intellectual Ventures argues that what separates them from patent trolls is that the company does not file frivolous lawsuits. Nonetheless, Intellectual Ventures shows the clear signs of a company that burdens innovation by using patents they buy to pursue lawsuits instead of building any products.
I really like how you went in great depth about the case. You specifically described the details of what Moto was accused of infringing. I would suggest adding some more of your opinion regarding the actions of Intellectual Ventures.
ReplyDeleteGreat description and comprehensive summary of the Motorola vs. Intellectual ventures case! I think you did a good job of also providing some analysis and input in your third paragraph of how Intellectual Ventures acts as a patent troll, namely by inhibiting productivity of other companies by using patents as a means to provoke lawsuits rather than innovation.
ReplyDeleteNice post! I like how you summarize the motorola v. Intellectual Ventures Case very well and give a comprehensive overview of the case and the outcome. Also I like how you include Intellectual ventures past performance and how they won $17M against Symantec. Nice work!
ReplyDeleteHey Rushil,
ReplyDeleteI really like how you gave us clear background on Motorla vs. Intellectual ventures case! I can tell that you did a thorough research and put thought into this. Great job!